<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Title Tag Replacement</title> <atom:link href="http://dejanseo.com.au/title-tag-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/title-tag-replacement/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Dejan SEO</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/title-tag-replacement/#comment-489</link> <dc:creator>Dejan SEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=6034#comment-489</guid> <description>My guess is that removal of brackets from the sentence will do the trick. Let&#039;s see what happens in a few days when they re-index.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that removal of brackets from the sentence will do the trick. Let&#8217;s see what happens in a few days when they re-index.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lachlan</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/title-tag-replacement/#comment-487</link> <dc:creator>Lachlan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=6034#comment-487</guid> <description>Nicely found! It is completely strange that Google choose to leave the brakets in, you would think if they can understand the semantic &quot;We&quot; they would know not to include brackets as well. I have now fixed this up. I thought about changing it to &quot;Sennza&quot; but it would most likely have the same effect so I&#039;ve just removed the brackets. I wonder if we added our brand name into our current title tag would Google revert to using this instead?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely found! It is completely strange that Google choose to leave the brakets in, you would think if they can understand the semantic &#8220;We&#8221; they would know not to include brackets as well. I have now fixed this up. I thought about changing it to &#8220;Sennza&#8221; but it would most likely have the same effect so I&#8217;ve just removed the brackets. I wonder if we added our brand name into our current title tag would Google revert to using this instead?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 350/374 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.dejanseo.com.au

 Served from: dejanseo.com.au @ 2013-05-26 17:30:27 by W3 Total Cache -->