<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Matt Cutts Clarifies Unnatural Link Notifications</title> <atom:link href="http://dejanseo.com.au/matt-cutts-clarifies-unnatural-link-notifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/matt-cutts-clarifies-unnatural-link-notifications/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: nguyentoloan</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/matt-cutts-clarifies-unnatural-link-notifications/#comment-1446</link> <dc:creator>nguyentoloan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=8582#comment-1446</guid> <description>Thank nice your post http://www.minmaxtravel.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank nice your post<br /> <a href="http://www.minmaxtravel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.minmaxtravel.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spark Junction</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/matt-cutts-clarifies-unnatural-link-notifications/#comment-898</link> <dc:creator>Spark Junction</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=8582#comment-898</guid> <description>Google claims that we should have &quot;natural links&quot;, not &quot;natural-looking&quot; ones. Perhaps they have blacklists of abusers who send outbound links and also blacklists with the receivers... And if you are &quot;part of the club&quot;, then you&#039;re going to be a target for penalties. I think it&#039;s otherwise quite hard to understand which link is really natural and which is not... Editorial links, even references tend to look identical. And I know that even some big sites do some link selling in-context... just to earn a few bucks more. Even some article editors practive this...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google claims that we should have &#8220;natural links&#8221;, not &#8220;natural-looking&#8221; ones.<br /> Perhaps they have blacklists of abusers who send outbound links and also blacklists with the receivers&#8230; And if you are &#8220;part of the club&#8221;, then you&#8217;re going to be a target for penalties.<br /> I think it&#8217;s otherwise quite hard to understand which link is really natural and which is not&#8230;<br /> Editorial links, even references tend to look identical. And I know that even some big sites do some link selling in-context&#8230; just to earn a few bucks more. Even some article editors practive this&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 365/374 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.dejanseo.com.au

 Served from: dejanseo.com.au @ 2013-05-23 03:46:41 by W3 Total Cache -->