<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is it enough to use Google Webmaster Tools for link clean-up?</title> <atom:link href="http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: nguyentoloan</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/#comment-1492</link> <dc:creator>nguyentoloan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10268#comment-1492</guid> <description>Thank your for share. I like it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank your for share. I like it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Hendison</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/#comment-1174</link> <dc:creator>Scott Hendison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10268#comment-1174</guid> <description>Wow, thanks Dan,  for digging this up!Like the other commenters here, I&#039;m skeptical, not only due to the 10k limit,  or the potential for more links being added &quot;tomorrow&quot;. but also because, as Sha says, &quot;You only have to look at the links surfaced by other tools to see that either these comments don&#039;t gel...&quot; -We&#039;ve all seen crappy links that we KNOW should be removed and have been puzzled why they&#039;e not listed in in GWT, haven&#039;t we?  What about links from a domain that gets penalized badly and deindexed?Is John Mueller actually saying &quot;It&#039;s okay to leave your crappy links up as long as they&#039;re not listed in GWT?&quot;  - I don&#039;t think so,    I think when doing cleanups we&#039;ll continue to do what I believe is the &quot;right thing&quot; and remove as much crap as possible, using all the tools at our disposal.thanks again for finding it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks Dan,  for digging this up!</p><p>Like the other commenters here, I&#8217;m skeptical, not only due to the 10k limit,  or the potential for more links being added &#8220;tomorrow&#8221;. but also because, as Sha says, &#8220;You only have to look at the links surfaced by other tools to see that either these comments don&#8217;t gel&#8230;&#8221; &#8211;</p><p>We&#8217;ve all seen crappy links that we KNOW should be removed and have been puzzled why they&#8217;e not listed in in GWT, haven&#8217;t we?  What about links from a domain that gets penalized badly and deindexed?</p><p>Is John Mueller actually saying &#8220;It&#8217;s okay to leave your crappy links up as long as they&#8217;re not listed in GWT?&#8221;  &#8211; I don&#8217;t think so,    I think when doing cleanups we&#8217;ll continue to do what I believe is the &#8220;right thing&#8221; and remove as much crap as possible, using all the tools at our disposal.</p><p>thanks again for finding it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tiggerito</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/#comment-1167</link> <dc:creator>Tiggerito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10268#comment-1167</guid> <description>GWMT has a limit to the backlinks it reports (Last I tested 10k) so if you have a high backlink count you will not see everything Google knows. The good side is that those 10k get spread over all domains so you should get a good domain level knowledge. Also, it refreshes and changes every few weeks so over time you can get a more complete picture,My opinion is data from GWMT should take priority, but if you have to dig deeper use other sources like Majestic SEO.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GWMT has a limit to the backlinks it reports (Last I tested 10k) so if you have a high backlink count you will not see everything Google knows. The good side is that those 10k get spread over all domains so you should get a good domain level knowledge. Also, it refreshes and changes every few weeks so over time you can get a more complete picture,</p><p>My opinion is data from GWMT should take priority, but if you have to dig deeper use other sources like Majestic SEO.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sha Menz</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/#comment-1166</link> <dc:creator>Sha Menz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 07:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10268#comment-1166</guid> <description>My Grandmother taught me a long time ago to &quot;believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see&quot;.You only have to look at the links surfaced by other tools to see that either these comments don&#039;t gel, or Google&#039;s ability to recognize the crap is way less developed than they would have us all believe.Our rmoov users are reporting good results by following the &quot;start by analyzing as many links as you can find&quot; method, and I would not recommend otherwise.All this video does for me is highlight yet another instance of a high profile Googler telling us how they believe things work at Google, when we can see for ourselves that something, somewhere is not working as they say it should :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Grandmother taught me a long time ago to &#8220;believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see&#8221;.</p><p>You only have to look at the links surfaced by other tools to see that either these comments don&#8217;t gel, or Google&#8217;s ability to recognize the crap is way less developed than they would have us all believe.</p><p>Our rmoov users are reporting good results by following the &#8220;start by analyzing as many links as you can find&#8221; method, and I would not recommend otherwise.</p><p>All this video does for me is highlight yet another instance of a high profile Googler telling us how they believe things work at Google, when we can see for ourselves that something, somewhere is not working as they say it should :(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Iwanow</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/link-cleanup/#comment-1165</link> <dc:creator>David Iwanow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10268#comment-1165</guid> <description>I don&#039;t care i&#039;m sticking with no GWT is not good enough just because Google doesn&#039;t have the links listed today doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t be added at some point in the future, also it&#039;s about reputation management if you have really bad links out there with your clients brand or pointing to a clients website</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care i&#8217;m sticking with no GWT is not good enough just because Google doesn&#8217;t have the links listed today doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t be added at some point in the future, also it&#8217;s about reputation management if you have really bad links out there with your clients brand or pointing to a clients website</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/13 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 399/409 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.dejanseo.com.au

 Served from: dejanseo.com.au @ 2013-06-19 21:45:06 by W3 Total Cache -->