<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: How Google&#8217;s 39 May Updates Impact SEO</title> <atom:link href="http://dejanseo.com.au/how-googles-39-may-updates-impact-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/how-googles-39-may-updates-impact-seo/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Alec Nelson</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/how-googles-39-may-updates-impact-seo/#comment-745</link> <dc:creator>Alec Nelson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=7759#comment-745</guid> <description>HI Dan, ok so this is a longish response and only 90% on topic as it springs from penguin update. But really I am reading your post and thinking that you guys really understand the recent updates so i would love to pick your brain for a one sentence reply.I am a small business owner doing my own seo and have been affected by mr penguin. Luckily for us it only affected certain keywords and resulted in a 30% loss of revenue but I figured out the issue and rectified it quickly. I have come to realise I have been following SEO advice that really works rather than than advice that is 100% Correct as far as google is concerned. As a result I have removed a ton of content from the web and unsubscribed from most of my rss feeds. Going forward I am really only wanting to concentrate on content for our own site and making us squeaky clean. The trouble is I am not 100% sure what is meant by &quot;over optimisation&quot;of internal links. Lets say I have a business selling electric razors and their parts (which I don&#039;t) and I am adding 4 or 5 new products a week. I am also creating a couple of blog entries discussing industry related stuff and also creating a couple of entries in our &quot;How To&quot; section describing how to maintain a particular model of razor. Now my real question is if these posts are all good quality information that is truly useful to consumers how much is too much linking to the relevant products?Currently I might include 2 or 3 anchor text links per piece of content and not to the same product and not using the same keyword eg  &quot;new braun battery&quot; &quot;braun shaver foils&quot; &quot;shaver foils&quot;  Over a few different pieces of content I may link to some of these keywords if appropriate.  Basically I am a bit paranoid now I know I need to be using internal links to help people and spiders and to me the links look totally natural but does thins sound like too much to you?Sorry that is so long but I really want to get this right going forward.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Dan, ok so this is a longish response and only 90% on topic as it springs from penguin update. But really I am reading your post and thinking that you guys really understand the recent updates so i would love to pick your brain for a one sentence reply.</p><p>I am a small business owner doing my own seo and have been affected by mr penguin. Luckily for us it only affected certain keywords and resulted in a 30% loss of revenue but I figured out the issue and rectified it quickly. I have come to realise I have been following SEO advice that really works rather than than advice that is 100% Correct as far as google is concerned. As a result I have removed a ton of content from the web and unsubscribed from most of my rss feeds. Going forward I am really only wanting to concentrate on content for our own site and making us squeaky clean. </p><p>The trouble is I am not 100% sure what is meant by &#8220;over optimisation&#8221;of internal links. Lets say I have a business selling electric razors and their parts (which I don&#8217;t) and I am adding 4 or 5 new products a week. I am also creating a couple of blog entries discussing industry related stuff and also creating a couple of entries in our &#8220;How To&#8221; section describing how to maintain a particular model of razor. Now my real question is if these posts are all good quality information that is truly useful to consumers how much is too much linking to the relevant products?</p><p>Currently I might include 2 or 3 anchor text links per piece of content and not to the same product and not using the same keyword eg <br /> &#8220;new braun battery&#8221; &#8220;braun shaver foils&#8221; &#8220;shaver foils&#8221; <br /> Over a few different pieces of content I may link to some of these keywords if appropriate. <br /> Basically I am a bit paranoid now I know I need to be using internal links to help people and spiders and to me the links look totally natural but does thins sound like too much to you?</p><p>Sorry that is so long but I really want to get this right going forward.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 348/371 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.dejanseo.com.au

 Served from: dejanseo.com.au @ 2013-05-23 11:28:34 by W3 Total Cache -->