Comments on: Google removes ‘Not Selected’ from Index Status http://dejanseo.com.au/google-removes-not-selected-from-index-status/ Sun, 26 May 2013 08:26:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Michael Kohlfürsthttp://dejanseo.com.au/google-removes-not-selected-from-index-status/#comment-1341 Michael Kohlfürst Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:20:00 +0000 http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10736#comment-1341 BUT, Not Selected was such a good feature, when I started my work with a new customer. Not happy with that. BUT, Not Selected was such a good feature, when I started my work with a new customer. Not happy with that.

]]> By: Peter Meadhttp://dejanseo.com.au/google-removes-not-selected-from-index-status/#comment-1339 Peter Mead Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:23:00 +0000 http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10736#comment-1339 Thanks for the heads up Dan. I agree, prefer it was still there. My background being involved in software design, I am not a fan of things changing too often. Particularly careful of feature removal, no matter how small, is always a negative thing for users. Unless the feature is clearly giving wrong or misleading information.Great info, I would have missed this until later on then wondered why it was gone. Thanks for the heads up Dan. I agree, prefer it was still there. My background being involved in software design, I am not a fan of things changing too often. Particularly careful of feature removal, no matter how small, is always a negative thing for users. Unless the feature is clearly giving wrong or misleading information.

Great info, I would have missed this until later on then wondered why it was gone.

]]>