http://dejanseo.com.au/google-knowledge-link/ Sat, 18 May 2013 16:29:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://dejanseo.com.au/google-knowledge-link/#comment-870 Chris Butterworth Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:02:00 +0000 http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=9247#comment-870 It could be argued that since the majority of information in knowledge graph comes from Wikipedia, which is not commercial, no one is losing out. If anything, reduced traffic = reduced costs for Wikipedia. The question becomes, is Google paying for the information they are taking from a non-profit organisation. It could be argued that since the majority of information in knowledge graph comes from Wikipedia, which is not commercial, no one is losing out. If anything, reduced traffic = reduced costs for Wikipedia. The question becomes, is Google paying for the information they are taking from a non-profit organisation.

]]> http://dejanseo.com.au/google-knowledge-link/#comment-869 Dejan SEO Tue, 04 Sep 2012 23:01:00 +0000 http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=9247#comment-869 if it's "Best for the user" it will be done. if it’s “Best for the user” it will be done.

]]> http://dejanseo.com.au/google-knowledge-link/#comment-868 Andrew Gloyns Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:55:00 +0000 http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=9247#comment-868 I'm split....the knowledge graph and this new markup is fantastic for the searcher - Google as a search engine are providing the answers even quicker. However, I really feel Google are biting the hand that feeds it by ultimately retaining traffic rather than directing it to other websites I’m split….the knowledge graph and this new markup is fantastic for the searcher – Google as a search engine are providing the answers even quicker. However, I really feel Google are biting the hand that feeds it by ultimately retaining traffic rather than directing it to other websites

]]>