Comments on: Google Does Take Action Against Content Scrapers

By: Lord of SEO

Lord of SEO — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:13:00 +0000

Probably sent that message because they read your blog tbf

By: Kunal Johari

Kunal Johari — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:03:00 +0000

Google Take Action

Bee Aware!
Don’t add your country secret your government policies, programs and ratio other wise other develop/under develop country may take advantage of it.

May USA, UK… developed countries government take advantage of your comment and your country’s government policies….

By: Kunal Johari

Kunal Johari — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:03:00 +0000

Google Take Action Petition: Add Your Voice to Keep the Internet

Bee Aware!
Don’t add your country secret your government policies, programs and ratio other wise other develop/under develop country may take advantage of it.

May USA, UK… developed countries government take advantage of your comment and your country’s government policies….

By: Jerry Okorie

Jerry Okorie — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:56:00 +0000

Great experiments Rob. I must have missed this in the articles, would this have worked if the domains where actually sub-directories rather than a sub-domain?

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:25:00 +0000

sure Ani, I think that experiment need to be done quietly, and wait some time, (maybe 2-3 months or wait for next panda/penguin update and then make serious, fundamental conclusions. I made some tests and can say that old articles which are specific time/ period related (for example – “Transformes 2 Logo”) after maximum 6 months when take position, retains there long time with minor change (+2, -1…etc ) – results on page 1 of course !

I think that Dejan has the resources to do it well.

By: Andre Buxey

Andre Buxey — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:33:00 +0000

Problem you have is , when G brings out a measure to combat spam, Spammers finds the “next best thing” to go around Google, yes it has become harder for them, however they are still around!

By: Saijo George

Saijo George — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:22:00 +0000

I would assume this happened because the pages were an exact copy .. most people just spin the content and this warning would most likely not appear :(

BTW .. did it just result in a warning or did you notice some impact on those duple page’s SERP performance ?

By: Christopher West

Christopher West — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:46:00 +0000

Good experiment Dejan. nice to see some useful info coming out of it.

By: Ani

Ani — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:31:00 +0000

I thought the same and this is what really worries me. If this is the case that they pay attention genuinely, it’s fine. But I have the feeling that they sent the message and took actions in relation to the articles which had recently appeared with Dan”s experiment. What do you think? Perhaps we should try and not make any noise to see what will happen

By: David Sewell

David Sewell — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:19:00 +0000

How many webmasters have received the “Quality Issues” notification recently, I wonder.. Seems useful if you have lazy copywriters to know there’s a detectable low quality flag.