<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Experiment With Tabbed Content</title> <atom:link href="http://dejanseo.com.au/experiment-with-tabbed-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/experiment-with-tabbed-content/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Kevin</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/experiment-with-tabbed-content/#comment-1474</link> <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10252#comment-1474</guid> <description>I&#039;d be interested in the results of a similar test, omitting the CSS selector reference to &quot;btnNext.png&quot;.  I don&#039;t have anything to back this, but I have an hunch that there&#039;s a more SEO-friendly implementation, at least when using the same library multiple times on the same domain (different products in a catalogue, for instance).If I&#039;m not mistaken, doesn&#039;t using the CSS selector to create the element mean aborting the document&#039;s HTMLParagraphElement chain?  (Back to DOM Level 0, in other words – along with all the other domain-level instances of this class?) Would it not be better to create the new element in the existing &#039;p&#039; element chain if so?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in the results of a similar test, omitting the CSS selector reference to &#8220;btnNext.png&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t have anything to back this, but I have an hunch that there&#8217;s a more SEO-friendly implementation, at least when using the same library multiple times on the same domain (different products in a catalogue, for instance).</p><p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, doesn&#8217;t using the CSS selector to create the element mean aborting the document&#8217;s HTMLParagraphElement chain?  (Back to DOM Level 0, in other words – along with all the other domain-level instances of this class?) Would it not be better to create the new element in the existing &#8216;p&#8217; element chain if so?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guest</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/experiment-with-tabbed-content/#comment-1168</link> <dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10252#comment-1168</guid> <description>We are using tabbed content on a number of our pages but everything comes back to the main page in the SERPS without the tab.  This page just was put up on the site within the last month and it has not really been though the SEO process.  Simple searches  such as What is VisionLink that should bring up a tab or others are coming up fairly high in the SERPS but take you to the main page.  While it does give you more content to work with and serves up smaller chunks for UX taking them to the tab from the SERP would be my choice too.  We are currently tracking the keyword they come in on and then looking at events placed on each tab to judge engagement.  From the results I am see in GA it doesn&#039;t look like some users are getting to the content they originally searched for.This woks for now but I am really interested in this experiment to get visitors to the right content and trigger the tab from the SERP.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are using tabbed content on a number of our pages but everything comes back to the main page in the SERPS without the tab.  This page just was put up on the site within the last month and it has not really been though the SEO process.  Simple searches  such as What is VisionLink that should bring up a tab or others are coming up fairly high in the SERPS but take you to the main page.  While it does give you more content to work with and serves up smaller chunks for UX taking them to the tab from the SERP would be my choice too.  We are currently tracking the keyword they come in on and then looking at events placed on each tab to judge engagement.  From the results I am see in GA it doesn&#8217;t look like some users are getting to the content they originally searched for.</p><p>This woks for now but I am really interested in this experiment to get visitors to the right content and trigger the tab from the SERP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Sewell</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/experiment-with-tabbed-content/#comment-1163</link> <dc:creator>David Sewell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10252#comment-1163</guid> <description>I believe the clear anchor is used. Jump to has been around for years, but few SEOs bother to optimise for this snippet. Search for &quot;freshwater frisbee&quot;  to see my own experiment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the clear anchor is used. Jump to has been around for years, but few SEOs bother to optimise for this snippet. Search for &#8220;freshwater frisbee&#8221;  to see my own experiment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Saijo George</title><link>http://dejanseo.com.au/experiment-with-tabbed-content/#comment-1162</link> <dc:creator>Saijo George</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dejanseo.com.au/?p=10252#comment-1162</guid> <description>Interesting, I havent seen the inline jump in SERPs before . It would be nice nice to figure out how to trigger those.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I havent seen the inline jump in SERPs before . It would be nice nice to figure out how to trigger those.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 382/386 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.dejanseo.com.au

 Served from: dejanseo.com.au @ 2013-06-18 14:46:30 by W3 Total Cache -->